Marina - I will reread what I wrote to make sure I didn't miscommunicate. What the article is talking about is negative rate of productivity growth, not a negative productivity growth. Even during… - Michael Simmons (blockbuster.thoughtleader.school)

…self in the article that even though the growth might be stagnating , productivity still increases. But in the next part you go directly to the negative effects of actual reduced productivity (which I can't see anywhere). Where are your sources for your assumption, that productivity will not only grow less rapidly but even start to decrease?
Very interesting article and thoughts you gathered here.
59
2
Marina
Michael Simmons (blockbuster.thoughtleader.school)
·Follow
Mar 10, 2023
--
Marina - I will reread what I wrote to make sure I didn't miscommunicate. What the article is talking about is negative rate of productivity growth, not a negative productivity growth.
Even during periods before 1800s, the productivity growth was still positive on average. It was just very low. So the consequences I'm talking about would be a result of a low productivity growth rate, not a negative one.
--
--
Written by Michael Simmons (blockbuster.thoughtleader.school)73K Followers
·3K Following
I teach people to learn HOW to learn / Serial entrepreneur / Bestselling author / Contributor: Time, Fortune, and Harvard Business Review)
Responses (1)
Help
Status
About
Careers
Press
Blog
Privacy
Terms
Text to speech
Teams